<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Yo, Joe!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: A. Lee Martinez</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link> <dc:creator>A. Lee Martinez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:44:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-78</guid> <description>Jonquest, I just want to say again that G.I. Joe is awesome.  I don&#039;t really get the CGI complaints.  Not everything is photo realistic, but so what?  I love the original King Kong, for example.  Complaints about CGI are almost always nitpicks in my opinion.  All fiction requires cooperation from the audience, and if the audience doesn&#039;t want to play along, then it really doesn&#039;t matter because a ninja jumping over a minivan is never going to look realistic.
I thought the CGI in the Wolverine movie was pretty bad, but to be fair, I thought the writing and acting in the movie was pretty terrible, so I was unforgiving of the FX.  If the movie had been better, it wouldn&#039;t have really mattered.
Also, for the record, Marlon Wayans is actually good in G.I. Joe.  Turns out that he&#039;s a decent enough actor as long as he doesn&#039;t have a say in the script and has a good director behind him.
Also, for the record, I really enjoyed Van Helsing.  I know apparently I&#039;m the only one, but it doesn&#039;t make me wrong.  So I guess you should take my recommendations for what it&#039;s worth.  (Quite a lot actually, but not everyone is blessed with my talent and insight.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonquest, I just want to say again that G.I. Joe is awesome.  I don&#8217;t really get the CGI complaints.  Not everything is photo realistic, but so what?  I love the original King Kong, for example.  Complaints about CGI are almost always nitpicks in my opinion.  All fiction requires cooperation from the audience, and if the audience doesn&#8217;t want to play along, then it really doesn&#8217;t matter because a ninja jumping over a minivan is never going to look realistic.</p><p>I thought the CGI in the Wolverine movie was pretty bad, but to be fair, I thought the writing and acting in the movie was pretty terrible, so I was unforgiving of the FX.  If the movie had been better, it wouldn&#8217;t have really mattered.</p><p>Also, for the record, Marlon Wayans is actually good in G.I. Joe.  Turns out that he&#8217;s a decent enough actor as long as he doesn&#8217;t have a say in the script and has a good director behind him.</p><p>Also, for the record, I really enjoyed Van Helsing.  I know apparently I&#8217;m the only one, but it doesn&#8217;t make me wrong.  So I guess you should take my recommendations for what it&#8217;s worth.  (Quite a lot actually, but not everyone is blessed with my talent and insight.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A. Lee Martinez</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link> <dc:creator>A. Lee Martinez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:24:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-76</guid> <description>I just want it on the record that I will let them do whatever the hell they want to my stories if it means I get the money and exposure that comes from a movie.  At least for the first one or two that get made.  (Assuming I&#039;m that lucky, of course.)
Hey, I gotta eat, right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want it on the record that I will let them do whatever the hell they want to my stories if it means I get the money and exposure that comes from a movie.  At least for the first one or two that get made.  (Assuming I&#8217;m that lucky, of course.)</p><p>Hey, I gotta eat, right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jonquest</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link> <dc:creator>jonquest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:52:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-72</guid> <description>My problem with a movie like Joe (which I have admittedly not seen) is not the notion that it needs to be smart or high brow, I love a good summer action popcorn flick as much as the next man.  I just think it &lt;em&gt;looks&lt;/em&gt; bad.  It looks like ol&#039; Sommer&#039;s hasn&#039;t upgraded his CGI game since Van Helsing.  I haven&#039;t ruled out seeing the movie and an A. Lee Martinez endorsement is a big plus... but then again I&#039;ve never seen a movie with Marlon Wayans in it... so why start now?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with a movie like Joe (which I have admittedly not seen) is not the notion that it needs to be smart or high brow, I love a good summer action popcorn flick as much as the next man.  I just think it <em>looks</em> bad.  It looks like ol&#8217; Sommer&#8217;s hasn&#8217;t upgraded his CGI game since Van Helsing.  I haven&#8217;t ruled out seeing the movie and an A. Lee Martinez endorsement is a big plus&#8230; but then again I&#8217;ve never seen a movie with Marlon Wayans in it&#8230; so why start now?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jboyd01</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link> <dc:creator>jboyd01</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:39:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-70</guid> <description>Hi Lee, This isn&#039;t the right place for this but...just saw Harry Potter and like most HP films the director chose to tell their own story and strip out most of JKR&#039;s subtlety and meaning. Specifically the last scene. Instead of what was in the book we get everyone from Hogwarts lighting their wands in unison to dispel the Dark Mark. Don&#039;t let them ever do this to your books please (not a realistic request but I wanted to make it anyway.)
James</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee, This isn&#8217;t the right place for this but&#8230;just saw Harry Potter and like most HP films the director chose to tell their own story and strip out most of JKR&#8217;s subtlety and meaning. Specifically the last scene. Instead of what was in the book we get everyone from Hogwarts lighting their wands in unison to dispel the Dark Mark. Don&#8217;t let them ever do this to your books please (not a realistic request but I wanted to make it anyway.)</p><p>James</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gabe</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link> <dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-65</guid> <description>I&#039;m willing to lay down hard cash for awesome ninja sequences. That&#039;s all I want out of this movie. If it&#039;s there, if it&#039;s awesome, I&#039;ll leave a happy customer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m willing to lay down hard cash for awesome ninja sequences. That&#8217;s all I want out of this movie. If it&#8217;s there, if it&#8217;s awesome, I&#8217;ll leave a happy customer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A. Lee Martinez</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link> <dc:creator>A. Lee Martinez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 05:33:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-64</guid> <description>Eccleson gets a significant amount of screen time, although his role of Destro is mostly behind the scenes and thus, often underplayed.  I felt he was in the movie enough to justify his existence, but not overused.  But then again, I&#039;m not an Eccleson fan (though I do enjoy him in whatever he&#039;s in so it&#039;s not like I don&#039;t like him).
Still, he has more lines than Snake Eyes. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eccleson gets a significant amount of screen time, although his role of Destro is mostly behind the scenes and thus, often underplayed.  I felt he was in the movie enough to justify his existence, but not overused.  But then again, I&#8217;m not an Eccleson fan (though I do enjoy him in whatever he&#8217;s in so it&#8217;s not like I don&#8217;t like him).</p><p>Still, he has more lines than Snake Eyes. <img
src='http://www.aleemartinez.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: frenchknitwave</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link> <dc:creator>frenchknitwave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:21:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-62</guid> <description>Wondering... does Christopher Eccleston get much screen time?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wondering&#8230; does Christopher Eccleston get much screen time?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://www.aleemartinez.com/yo-joe/blog/08082009/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:06:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleemartinez.com/?p=116#comment-61</guid> <description>Might see this soon. Less and less time on my hands though, so I may miss it at the cinema and catch it on DVD - but every time I&#039;ve had time for a movie recently, I&#039;ve wanted action....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might see this soon. Less and less time on my hands though, so I may miss it at the cinema and catch it on DVD &#8211; but every time I&#8217;ve had time for a movie recently, I&#8217;ve wanted action&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
