I try very hard not to be the guy telling anyone they’re doing it wrong. Who am I to determine what works and what doesn’t? I’m just one writer, and not a very successful one at that. I get by, and I’ve written enough that I feel comfortable sharing my opinions on writing. But it’s all just so much random chatter in the end. Nobody knows what works, and if they tell you they do, they’re lying to you and probably themselves as well. Nevertheless, I’ve grown sick by the number of people, artists and audience, who simply lack the imagination to write interesting stories that defy expectations.
Lack of imagination is exactly the problem.
Storytelling is an art, and all too often, it’s easy to stick with what works. Sometimes, it’s because a writer doesn’t care enough to try anything differently. More often, it’s a byproduct of an accepted “truth” about the nature of storytelling. In any case, it’s always comes down to the idea that certain characters and situations are “boring” and the only way they work is by having artificial melodrama thrust upon them. Yes, I get it. Most stories thrive on conflict, and a lot of situations make conflict more difficult. I’m not expecting every writer to have the ability to tell a story that breaks the rules, but I do expect some writers to try every so often.
Perhaps the most common pet peeve I have at this point is that having a couple in any kind of stable relationship is a drama killer. It doesn’t seem to matter if the couple is married or dating, if characters are in a relationship of any sort in a story, you can expect it will be in trouble. And if it isn’t in trouble, then you can expect one of them to be kidnapped or endangered to motivate the other. But a pair of adults in any kind of ongoing relationship is always going to demand too much of most writers, who have been trained to see it as an opportunity for conflict.
When I wrote Divine Misfortune (my seventh book. Yes, I write books, and you should read them because they’re good), I deliberately featured a married couple among the protagonists. Their marriage isn’t in trouble, and I very much wanted them to be in a solid relationship. Even as their world is getting screwed up by the gods they’ve become entwined with, they never turn on each other. They always rely on each other. At the end, one attempts to make a sacrifice for the other, but in the end, it’s shown to be a silly, needless gesture. Their marriage isn’t a source of drama. It’s important to the plot, but it isn’t there to create problems. Far from it. Yes, it’s harder to write that kind of relationship. That was kind of the point.
Yet over and over again, we’re reminded that people in stable relationships are boring, but I say a good couple isn’t boring. A bad writer is bad at making happy people interesting.
It doesn’t stop there. We live in a world where unambiguous heroes are considered dull and unrealistic. Even Superman, an empowerment fantasy about being able to save the world, has devolved into a mopey guy who lets his father die and watches half of Metropolis crumble. Sure, he saves the day, but he makes sure to remind you he feels bad about it too. And he can’t do so without killing a guy because if there’s anything that would make Superman more interesting, it’s a disregard for life.
(Don’t tell me he feels bad about killing a guy either. He’s perfectly content to kiss Lois Lane atop a thousand buried corpses a few minutes later.)
I’m not against ambiguity, and a lot of great stories are built on crumbling relationships. I enjoy many a conflicted hero, and I know that not every character can be happily married (nor should they be). But I can’t help but feel that so there is a genuine lack of imagination when we so often resort to artificial conflict. Life is complicated, and if one part of it is working out all right, that doesn’t mean the whole thing is without drama.
I liked Spider-Man as a married man, even when I wasn’t married, because I didn’t give a damn about watching Spider-Man in the singles scene. There was something unique about a working class superhero with working class problems, who still had a caring wife to go home to. Yes, she was a supermodel, and it was a bit weird as a story conceit, but these are stories about a guy who was bitten by a radioactive spider and gained super strength. So I was on board.
The same is often said of Mr. Fantastic and The Invisible Woman. Writers can’t wait to put their marriage through the ringer on the assumption that being superhero adventurers isn’t enough drama. John McClaine’s marriage in the Die Hard series depends entirely on what is easiest for the story at the moment, i.e. whatever brings the most conflict to the table. The list goes on and on, and each entry on it says characters are not allowed to have any stability and be interesting.
I don’t expect that will change anytime soon. I blame the audience and the creators, both of whom are too often guilty of taking the easy road to conflict. It’s only when the audience starts demanding more and the creators dare challenge their own expectations of where drama is found that we’ll ever break out of it. We can do better, and there is nothing wrong with expecting more.
Fighting the good fight, Writing the good write,